Daily calorie intake by age, sex and activity

The official estimates in one chart, what the 2,000-calorie label means, and how to get your own number.

The recommended daily calorie intake for adults is about 1,600–2,400 calories for women and 2,000–3,000 calories for men, according to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020–2025. Where you fall depends on your age and how active you are. These are averages for maintaining weight; your own need can be several hundred calories different. Get a personal figure with the maintenance calories calculator or the TDEE calculator.

Infographic: Daily calorie intake by age, sex and activity. The 2,000 on food labels is a reference, not your target.
The short version. Tap to open full size, then save or share it.

Daily calorie intake chart

AgeSedentaryModerately activeActive
Women
19–301,800–2,0002,000–2,2002,400
31–501,8002,0002,200
51+1,6001,8002,000–2,200
Men
19–302,400–2,6002,600–2,8003,000
31–502,200–2,4002,400–2,6002,800–3,000
51+2,000–2,2002,200–2,4002,400–2,800

Source: Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020–2025, Appendix 2. Values are for adults of average height and a healthy weight, and are not for pregnant or breastfeeding women.

What the activity levels mean

  • Sedentary: only the light activity of daily life.
  • Moderately active: daily life plus the equivalent of walking about 1.5–3 miles (2.4–4.8 km) a day at 3–4 mph.
  • Active: daily life plus the equivalent of walking more than 3 miles (4.8 km) a day at 3–4 mph.

Not sure how far you walk? The walking calorie calculator turns your steps into distance.

The 2,000-calorie label

The "based on a 2,000 calorie diet" line on nutrition labels is a reference for comparing foods, not a target. A small, sedentary woman over 50 may need about 1,600; a tall, active young man may need 3,000 or more.

From averages to your number

The chart assumes average height and weight. If you are taller, heavier or more muscular than average, you'll need more; if you're smaller, less. A calculator uses your actual size.

Example: woman, 55, 70 kg, 160 cm, sedentaryThe chart says about 1,600 calories for her group. Her own estimate with Mifflin-St Jeor is 1,264 × 1.2 = 1,517 calories, about 80 fewer, because she is shorter than the reference woman. If she starts walking regularly and moves to Light activity, her estimate rises to about 1,738.

Calorie intake for weight loss or gain

The chart is for maintaining weight. To lose weight, start from your own maintenance and subtract 250–500 calories; to gain, add 250–500. How many calories should I eat? walks through the steps, and calories to lose weight covers deficits in detail.

See your own maintenance calories at every activity level.

Open the maintenance calculator

Frequently asked questions

What is the recommended daily calorie intake?
The Dietary Guidelines for Americans estimate about 1,600–2,400 calories a day for adult women and 2,000–3,000 for adult men, depending on age and activity. The 2,000-calorie figure on food labels is a reference value, not a personal recommendation.
Why do food labels use 2,000 calories?
It is a round reference number that makes it easier to compare foods using % Daily Value. It is close to the average need of many adults, but your own need may be higher or lower.
Do calorie needs drop with age?
Yes. In the Dietary Guidelines table, a sedentary woman's estimate falls from about 1,800–2,000 calories in her twenties to about 1,600 after 50. Men show a similar drop.
Are these numbers for weight loss?
No. They are estimates for maintaining a healthy weight. To lose weight, start from your own TDEE and subtract 250–500 calories.

Keep reading

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. Appendix 2: Estimated calorie needs per day, by age, sex and physical activity level. dietaryguidelines.gov
  2. Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA, Koh YO. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51(2):241–247. PubMed 2305711